Tuesday, July 28, 2009

not everything is black and white

Obama said he hopes that the Gates arrest becomes a teachable moment. Is the lesson that if you are a friend, fundraiser and contributor to Barack Obama, you are innocent, and if you are a white cop, backed by a Union that supported John McCain, you are indeed racist, therefore stupid (and guilty)?

Earlier in the day, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs dismissed a suggestion that the backlash from police groups could be distressing to the White House, given that Obama has enjoyed a positive relationship with the law enforcement community.

"I think the Fraternal Order of Police endorsed McCain," Gibbs fired back, referring to Obama's Republican opponent in the 2008 election. "If I'm not mistaken."

Hmmm, does Obama think this is, in the end, all about him?

Did Obama throw Crowley and the Police Department under the bus because they didn't back him in the election? Is Gibbs telling us that Obama doesn't care that the Fraternal Order of Police are backing Crowley because they backed McCain? And what the Governor and Mayor that supported Obama, and believe that Crowley was in the wrong?

From all I have read about this arrest, it seems if you are a Democrat you hate cops and think they are all racist idiots. And if you support the cop you are a racist psycho right wing loon...?

Just look at this insult directed towards Crowley, from John Ridley: "Why all this interest -- besides the curiosity as to whether or not the arresting officer had ever once in his life previously used the word "tumultuous" in a sentence?" Are you kidding me? What an elitist ass.

And this diary was hilarious - Daily Kos: The cop lied because Gates couldn't yell - he had laryngitis!

"Now, if this is the case, Gates has a doctor's report, as well as many witnesses who would have heard him over the course of the last few days, having difficulty speaking, much less yelling. So it isn't something he is likely to just make up. This is especially true after talking to his lawyer, who would not have signed on to using this storyline, if it were not true, considering how easily it would be refuted if it were false. So I'm convinced that this is the case, that he couldn't have yelled. This makes the police report false.

You may want to see more evidence that the things in the report are wrong, but keep in mind that the yelling key to the officer's story. It's the only thing that could justify an arrest (for "loud and tumultuous" behavior) in this situation. And though this is only one piece of evidence, I think the police report being wrong is the more likely situation, than Gates and his legal team stupidly clinging to a easily-refutable story about bronchitis."

It's too bad that this Dick Tracy didn't research the facts before calling Sgt. Crowley a liar.

Bill Carter, the man who snapped a photograph of Gates being led away in handcuffs, said police officers were calm and that Gates was "slightly out of control" and "agitated" when he was arrested.

"The officers around kind of calmed him down," Carter said. "I heard him yelling -- Mr. Gates yelling. I didn't hear anything that he was saying so I couldn't say that he was belligerent."

Officer Figueroa heard Gates yelling which he stated in the police report. Sgt. Leon Lashley heard him yelling as well. If you haven't seen this yet, here is the African American officer that was visible in the photo of Gates in handcuffs.




A 55-year-old neighbor said he witnessed the entire episode
- from the squeal of police brakes in the initial response to Gates' uproar. "The police did their job. He should be thanking them, but they shouldn't have arrested the guy," the neighbor added.

He also apparently wasn't aware of the audio tapes.

There might be witnesses that Gates had laryngitis, but those would be from the day after the arrest. Who wouldn't lose their voice from all that yelling!

Some of the Kos Kids believe that because Crowley didn't vote for Obama he is in fact racist. "When Crowley said he didn't vote for Obama that's all I needed to hear right there." Well, that certainly fits with the crap they have been spewing for two years now.

Tapper pondered whether Obama had ever been profiled. Turns out he was *GASP* mistaken for an hostess once.

As the country discusses and dissects the controversy surrounding the arrest of Prof. Henry Louis Gates, and President Obama's comments about the arrest, some might wonder: was the president ever a victim of racial profiling?

Not in any major way, say those close to him, but he certainly feels there have been times he was treated differently because of his race. One small, as-yet-unreported example: in the Fall of 2004, then-state sen. Barack Obama was his party’s nominee for the U.S. Senate seat and an emerging national figure because of his rousing speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. But there he stood, at a country buffet in Western Illinois, fielding a question from a white customer as if he worked there. As recalled by a campaign staffer from that time, Obama was standing with three staffers, waiting for their table, when a white man came in and asked for a table for him and his three friends.

“The woman is about to seat me and my party of four, so I imagine you’ll be next,” the President said, trying to defuse any embarrassment by playing it off. The man who’d assumed Obama worked at the country buffet seemed embarrassed, the former campaign aide recalled, who emphasized that this was not a big deal by any stretch.


Perhaps the guy wasn't used to seeing people dressed up at Country Buffet, maybe Obama looked like a Host because he was in a tie? Maybe the guy was a frequent buffet diner and the regular Host resembled Obama? Maybe Obama was holding a menu? It can happen.

Do you know how many times I have been mistaken for a sales clerk or a waitress? I can think of about 20 times - whether in clothing stores, grocery stores, or restaurants. It happens a lot, and when it does, I usually end up helping the person.

I was accused of shoplifting once when I was returning something to Nordstrom without a receipt. I was dressed like a slob because I had been working in the garden, and I made a quick run to Home Depot, and swung into Nordies. The salesperson, surrounded by five other clerks, eying me strangely, gave me a *receipt* instead of my money back ($600) and told me the *check was in the mail*. I thought it odd, and went home and told my brother what happened. He called his friend who worked there, and explained my story. We found out that is what they do when they think the item was stolen.

I have had many sales clerks treat me crappy while shopping dressed less than stellar - trust me, looks make a big difference white or black. Beverly Hills/Rodeo Drive is the worst. (I'm no Julia Roberts, and I wasn't dressed like a hooker, but the attitudes exist.)

And yes, I've even handed my car keys off to a guy I thought was a valet (although, he was white). And I have even been pulled over six times.


crash


From Just One Minute:

Patterico is excellent with "The Officer Didn’t Stereotype Henry Louis Gates — Henry Louis Gates Stereotyped the Officer", emphasizing the same point made earlier by Mickey Kaus. A snippet:

And in apologizing for Gates, black firebrands and white liberals patronizingly excuse techniques of stereotyping that they would condemn in a racist.

Form an image of a racist in your mind: someone who watches a TV report about a crime committed by a black person, and says: “I’m not surprised. That’s how black people are: they’re all criminals.” Is this racist attitude justified if the racist says:

I’m sorry I have this bad attitude about black people, but I have seen and heard bad things about black people all my life. I know they commit a lot of crimes, and in fact, I have been robbed by three separate black people in my life.

Now, form an image in your mind of a black person who watches a TV report about police brutality, and says: “I’m not surprised. That’s how those white cops are: they’re all racists.” Is this attitude justified if the black person says:

I’m sorry I have this bad attitude about white cops, but I have seen and heard bad things about white cops all my life. I know they hassle black people, and in fact, I have been mistreated by three separate white cops in my life.

For some reason, people who would never accept the racist’s justification of his racist attitudes, will nod their heads in approval as black people expound on why they believe all white cops are racists based upon their own personal experiences.


Interesting. Yet that line of argumentation is so common, and so commonly accepted, that I feel obliged to take a stab at defending it. One tack - people don't choose their race but they do choose their vocation - a person who chooses to become a police officer probably does have a set of attitudes that differ from the general population in various ways (More authoritarian? More controlling?).

And why would that justify having an attitude only about white cops? I don't know. Gates seems to believe that cops hassle blacks men that mouth off; I think cops hassle everyone who mouths off, but where is my street cred? The Times front-paged a story on this.

ONE MORE TIME: Gates claims he produced a driver's license with the address of the house in question, thereby establishing his right to be there. Should that have been the end of the story? Husbands and wives sometimes have nasty separations in which the husband gets kicked out the wife changes the locks; sometimes that can even escalate to the point where the wife takes out a Temporary Restraining Order. I have no idea what sort of probable cause threshold would be appropriate, but shouldn't the police make a modest effort to take the emotional temperature of the household before leaving? Gates was seemingly angry and uncooperative from the outset; per Crowley's version, Gates would not even respond when asked if anyone was in the house with him (In the Gates version, he does not describe the question but does refuse to answer).

So - do feminists and domestic violence experts agree that if the man of the house shouts at the cops that everything is cool so get out, the cops should simply leave?


This was an excellent point that I have seen made on a few sites. Domestic squabbles, and less than cordial divorces are a big issue. If a man, no matter how educated or old he is, is breaking into a home, the officer needs to establish that the guy has a right to be there. And not only that, but as Crowley said, he needs to make sure that Gates is one of the guys that was breaking in and that there aren't two real burglars hiding in the home somewhere. (Especially considering Gates' homes had been robbed in the past month, and daytime break ins are currently exceptionally high in that neighborhood.)

And the craziest thing about Gates getting so mad that a cop showed up at his door is that Gates KNOWS he was breaking in the front door. It's not like the notion was out of the blue.

One of our readers tried to get me to answer an hypothetical about the statistics on African American profiling, and whether, knowing those statistics, I would have reacted the way Gates did.

"Be serious… if a cop showed up at your door, demanded ID and continued to be suspicious when you provided it, you wouldn’t be aggravated?

Hypothetical: what if you were in, say, Italy. And what if you knew that 70% of the time Italian cops investigated someone for potential criminal behavior, they investigated an American Woman. Let’s say they had been doing this for years and years. And let’s say you knew that only 15% of the people in the land of Italy were American Women. Let’s say you also knew that American Women committed nowhere near 75% of the crimes in Italy.

So then an Italian cop responds to a B&E at your house, and thinks you’re the one breaking in. Let’s say you show this Italian cop documentation proving that it’s your house, but he keeps on questioning you.

This wouldn’t make you angry? Really? Really??"


Firstly, I have a hard time applying this hypothetical to Gates, since, as a 58 year old man, this is, according to Gates, the first time this has happened to him. (For a man who studies and teaches about racism, I find it odd that he "now understands what it's like to be a black man in America". What's he been teaching all those years?) So, evidently he knew about the statistics but never experienced them - so they are about as relevant to him as they are to me. Secondly, Gates didn't immediately show his ID, and he was hostile. Thirdly, as was pointed out above, just because you show ID it doesn't automatically guarantee that you have a right to be in that home. And lastly, the officer was also making sure there weren't two robbers hidden in the home.

(How many of the 70% investigated were found guilty of something? What are the stop to conviction ratios? I couldn't find that info.)

So, anyway, I proposed this hypothetical:

Let’s say I am a woman, and I have been raped, and I know about all of these statistics:

Every 9 seconds, a woman is battered in the U.S. 95% of all victims of domestic violence are women. Domestic Violence is the single major cause of injury to women, more than muggings and car accidents combined. Domestic Violence is the cause of 30% of physical disabilities in women. 50% of all women murdered in the United States are killed by a spouse or an acquaintance. Domestic Violence occurs in 60% of marriages and is the most under reported crime. 90% of battered women reported that their children were present when they were beaten. etc….

I don’t live in fear and paranoia, and I don’t profile and assume that every man I encounter is going to attack me, abuse me, or beat me. I don't avoid getting married, and I don't yell at every man that approaches my front door.

So, what lesson do I hope is learned from this ugly situation? That not everything is black and white. Yes, racism still exists. So does sexism, ageism, classism, ableism, and fatism. (fatism...obesityism... chunkyism?)

Everybody defending Gates assumes that he was profiled, and the victim of a racist white cop. Did any of those defending him stop to consider that perhaps he was disorderly, rude, out of control, in the wrong, and deserved to be arrested? (Because I certainly cringed when I heard Gates' claims of racism, but I looked at the facts, and discovered the truth.) People are still defending him, arguing that he should not have been arrested, that he has a right to behave how he wants, that it is not illegal to yell at police, etc. etc. Their position is that because Gates was in his home, and he showed his ID that it is obviously racism because he is black and the cop is white. Had he been white, they say, he would not have been arrested.

That is just not true. Have you ever watched Cops? Geez, I see white people who mouth off (in their own homes) get taken down all the time.

Not only do white people get arrested, they are stereotyped. Everyone is. Women, blonds, obese people, disabled people, poor people, poor dressers, the elderly, young people, Asian people, Jewish people, Muslims....

It happens to everyone, and everyone is guilty of stereotyping. Are state university students really dumber than Ivy Leaguers? (Hmm think about the attitudes towards Sarah Palin). Are obese people lazy? Do thin people starve themselves? Are blonde women dumb? Are smart, successful women bitchy ball breakers? Is it true Asian people can't drive? Is a woman in a short skirt at fault for getting raped? Liberals think Conservatives are racist Jesus freaks. Are all white people racist? Are all Muslims terrorists? And on and on and on... It happens every day.

That's why we all just need to "cool that shit out. And that's the double truth, Ruth."

It isn't always black and white. So, instead of jumping on Sgt. Crowley, a good officer, doing his job, perhaps the teachable moment is don't always assume the white guy is the racist.

And the bigger lesson - don't assume the worst of people!

crash-2


Racism is terrible, but accusing innocent people of being racist is terrible too. We have some along way. If we are ever going to truly move past racism and it's ugly history, we have to meet somewhere in the middle, don't we? We have to stop pointing fingers all the time.

And I really don't think we need a resolution to force Obama to apologize. That is something he, and Gates, should do willingly. Congress has more important things to focus on.

"acting stupidly* has cost obama some votes

This is a touching video full of emotion. I can't imagine this has been easy for Crowley's fellow officers, either. The interview is with some of the Cambridge Police Officers following the press conference.



Sgt. Leon Lashley is the officer seen in the foreground of the snapshot of Gates in cuffs.

Kelly King also supports Crowley, and although she voted for Obama, he has since lost her support.


Do you think this will cost Obama support, in the long run?

Monday, July 27, 2009

gates-gate: the tale of the actual tapes UPDATED

The 911 call and radio dispatch tapes were released. The 911 call reveals that the *racist neighbor* that everyone attacked is anything but. (In fact, I do believe it is the 911 operator that asks if they are Hispanic..?)



This also supports Crowley's statements that he wanted to be sure Gates was one of the men seen *breaking in* and that there weren't two men hiding in the home somewhere. Which is why he asked Gates if anyone was in the house with him.

UPDATE:
There is a longer video from msnbc. In the original video I ad posted, you hear Crowley making two statements, quite calmly. You can, at one point hear Gates yell something in the background. Crowley says, "he's not being very cooperative" at one point. And "The gentlemen says he resides here." In this longer video you can hear Gates yell a few more times, in the background.

Crowley also made several transmissions before having Gates' name, which supports his statements that Gates would not give him ID.



Apparently his laryngitis wasn't that bad... I wonder if he didn't lose his voice until the following day, after all that yellin'!

I think everything so far supports Sgt. Crowley, and the other officers.

I am quite happy that the woman who called 911 has been MORE than vindicated.

SO, when are the apologies going to start rolling in?


"As always, whitey now sits in judgment of me, preparing to cast my fate."

~Henry Louis Gates Jr.


gates says it's time to ‘move on’ from his arrest

Yes, with all the evidence mounting against him, I'm sure Gates does want to put this arrest behind him.
"In the end, this is not about me at all."

"I told the president that my principal regret was that all of the attention paid to his deeply supportive remarks during his press conference had distracted attention from his health care initiative," Gates said. "I am pleased that he, too, is eager to use my experience as a teaching moment, and if meeting Sergeant Crowley for a beer with the president will further that end, then I would be happy to oblige."

"It is time for all of us to move on, and to assess what we can learn from this experience."

"This could and should be a profound teaching moment in the history of race relations in America," Gates said. "I sincerely hope that the Cambridge police department will choose to work with me toward that goal."

"If my experience leads to the lessening of the occurrence of racial profiling, then I would find that enormously gratifying," Gates said on The Root. "Because, in the end, this is not about me at all; it is about the creation of a society in which 'equal justice before law' is a lived reality."

This can never move forward until Gates and Obama apologize, and admit their mistakes. They profiled Crowley, and they smeared him, and his reputation. They are trying to turn this into a teachable moment, pushing the idea that Crowley acted inappropriately, and profiled Gates. They aren't backing down from that, and until they do, the issue is stuck.

This can serve as a teachable moment if the intent is to teach that falsely accusing a white officer, or anyone, of being a racist is wrong. Racial profiling is wrong, and as Gates has proved, it goes both ways.

Gates did not receive equal treatment under the law - he received preferential treatment. His charges were dropped the minute he threw the race card, and dropped a few names.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy


Race Not Mentioned in Harvard Scholar 911 Call

The 911 caller who reported a possible break-in at the home of black Harvard scholar Henry Louis Gates, Jr. did not mention race in the call, according to a statement issued by her attorney and backed up by Cambridge Police Commissioner Robert Haas.

Lucia Whalen placed the 911 call July 16, saying she saw two men on Gates' front porch who appeared to be trying to force open the front door. The call led to the arrest of Gates by Cambridge police on a disorderly conduct charge, and the resulting national firestorm.

In the statement issued Sunday by attorney Wendy Murphy, Whalen — who has not spoken publicly — said she only saw the backs of the two men and did not know their race when she made the call. Murphy said Whalen, who works nearby, called because she had been aware of recent break-ins in the area and was "personally devastated" by suggestions that she placed the call because the men on the porch were black.

Murphy said Whalen was 100 percent certain that she never said she saw two black men.

"It was very clear that she wasn't sure what the men's race was," Haas said in an interview with The Boston Globe Sunday night.

Haas said Whalen, after questioning by the dispatcher during the 911 call, speculated that one of the men — who turned out to be Gates and a black car service driver — may have been Hispanic.


UPDATE: An Obfuscatable Moment

Today, on Fox News Sunday, Juan Williams came up with a fine formulation, in the context of the Henry Louis Gates imbroglio:

"But in this situation, the president spoke without the facts. And so you can't have a teachable moment if it's based on a lie."

Amid all the blather about "teachable moments," I don't recall anyone else making this simple but profound observation: "You can't have a teachable moment if it's based on a lie." Another way of putting it might be to say that it's not a "moment" that's teachable, it's the truth that's teachable.



h/t newsbuster.com

Friday, July 24, 2009

gates-gate: the tale of the tape

This is part two of the post I wrote yesterday, obama: i don’t know anything about it, except the white cop acted stupidly.

New information has been released, and more interviews have been given.

Just to recap, in addition to:

~the corroborating second police report

~the fact that Gates' home had been broken into while he was away.

~ the photo showing Gates yelling (and the testimony of the man who took the photo that he heard Gates yelling)

henry_gates_porch_072109-300x2391

~the officer's experience as a racial profiling expert and instructor

~the admission by Gates that he drew the race card in his accusations towards Crowley

"Are you not giving me your name and badge number because I'm a black man in America?" Gates said he was arrested because "a white cop couldn't tolerate having an intellectual black man stand up to him". “I’m a Harvard professor . . . You believe white women over black men.”

~the backing of the Police Commissioner Robert Haas



~the President of the Police Union

Sgt. Dennis O'Connor, the president of the police union that represents Crowley and other superior officers in the Cambridge Police Department, told ABC News that Gates' arrest was "100 percent lawful" and that Obama should apologize to "Sgt. Crowley and all Cambridge Police officers."

"Sgt. Crowley has been called a racist, a liar and stupid,'' O'Connor said in an interview with ABC News. "Barack Obama just devastated the morale of the Cambridge Police Department. There are a lot of disheartened police officers out there. The remark was completely uncalled for. Sgt. Crowley -- and the entire Cambridge police force -- are owed an apology."
~and friends and fellow officers (black and white)

we now have the actual tale of the tapes.

Perhaps this is why Crowley is now considering filing a defamation suit against Henry Gates. He very well should.

911, Police Tapes Key in Gates Case - Officials mull release of recorded evidence

Mounting pressure to get to the bottom of the controversial arrest of black scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr. is centering on recorded police tapes that may offer a dose of reality amid all the media and political noise.

Cambridge police brass and lawyers are weighing making the tapes public, which could include the 911 call reporting a break-in at Gates’ home and radio transmissions by the cop who busted him July 16 for disorderly conduct.

“It’s powerful evidence because the (people involved) have not had a chance to reflect and you are getting their state of mind captured on tape,” said former prosecutor and New York City police officer Eugene O’Donnell, who is now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in Manhattan.

Cambridge Police Commissioner Robert Haas said last night he has asked City Solicitor Donald Drisdell to review the 911 tape, which has the potential to either bolster or impugn Gates’ stance that he is a blameless victim of racial profiling at his own home.

Further, Sgt. James Crowley noted in his report that he radioed police headquarters to let them know he was with the person who appeared to be the home’s lawful resident, but who was “very uncooperative.”

snip

Haas did not share with reporters what can be heard on the tapes, but commented, “I don’t believe Sgt. Crowley acted with any racial motivation at all.”

Gates, 58, a world-renowned scholar and documentary filmmaker on black history, allegedly ranted to police at his Ware Street home, “This is what happens to black men in America!” and “You don’t know who you’re messing with!” in addition to verbally dragging Crowley’s mother into the fray.

“More often than not,” O’Donnell said, “as the facts come out, they are more favorable to the cop. It’s crucial in the sense that it provides independent evidence. There is no question it provides corroboration. He called the tapes potentially “crucial” to Crowley’s ability to defend himself against charges of racism.

Attorney Stuart London, who has defended countless cops in high-profile cases, including one of the NYPD officers charged in the 1998 beating and plunger torture of Abner Louima in 1998, said, “If (the officer is dealing) with someone who is not being cooperative and is unruly, (the tape) gives you more insight into the state of mind of the officer. That’s the most important part.”

“I don’t believe this officer did anything wrong, and given what we know, I don’t think he would be afraid to share the tapes at all, either,” said Thomas Nee, president of the Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association. “It’s public record. From dispatch to conclusion, it’s all on tape.”
The tapes haven't been released yet, but from the statements above it seems the tapes verify Crowley to be the one telling the truth.

Sgt. Crowley gave an interview this morning, where he goes into detail, and rebuts Gates' account of the arrest.


crolwey-video
Click video to view. Will take you to a new site.

(While Crowley was describing his initial arrival at the home, and expressing his concern for his safety I kept thinking about his poor wife, and how scary it must be being married to a police officer.)

I feel bad for the guy, his life has been turned upside down (I swear I wrote that right before the interviewer asked him that question). I hope he sues.

From viewing all the networks and the coverage, it seems that almost all African American pundits stand with Gates, except Bill Cosby. He couldn't believe Obama commented on the case.

On a Boston radio program this morning, Bill Cosby suggested that President Obama spoke too soon on the controversial arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates.

“I’ve heard about five different reports [on the details of the arrest],” Cosby said on Boston’s WZLX. “If I’m the president of the United States, I don’t care how much pressure people want to put on it about race, I’m keeping my mouth shut.”

“I was shocked to hear the president making this kind of statement,” Cosby said referring to the president’s remarks during last night’s press conference.
The media, Obama included, jumped at the opportunity to paint an Officer of the Law as a racist. Mika from Morning Joe seems to believe the media was too quick to judge. I loved these two videos from Morning Joe this morning. I can't wait for Eugene to eat crow.

Click here for Mika and Eugene Robinson debate from Morning Joe.

It is unfortunate Mika is getting hate mail over this, however, I am not surprised.
Click here for Did the Cambridge Police Act Stupidly from Morning Joe.

I have a feeling Obama is going to wish he had stayed out of this. And what do you know - he does. But he blames the media for escalating the incident, not his comments to 28 million people during a live event.


Press secretary Robert Gibbs told NBC News that Obama wished he had not escalated the issue, adding that the media's "obsessions" were keeping alive Obama's comments.

"Had he known it would become such a media distraction, he would have refrained from commenting. But the president has said all he's going to say on the issue," Gibbs told NBC News. "He has not talked to Gates nor the Cambridge police officer."
It's funny how so many people believe that just because someone is rich, educated and walks with a limp they are above the law, and can abuse and harass police as they see fit. One phone call and Gates' charges were dropped. Well, one race card, and one phone call.

David Frank, a former prosecutor and a writer for Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, said it was "unusual" for a case to be "nul-processed" [charges dropped] without a court appearance. Gates was slated to be arraigned on disorderly conduct charges Aug. 26.

There is much more about this at memorandum.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

update on the gate-gate - see post below

Sgt. James Crowley joins Dennis and Callahan to tell his side of the Professor Gates story. Listen here.

And I love this article:

Cop Who Arrested Black Scholar is Profiling Expert

The white police sergeant criticized by President Barack Obama for arresting black scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr. in his Massachusetts home is a police academy expert on racial profiling.

Cambridge Sgt. James Crowley has taught a class on racial profiling for five years at the Lowell Police Academy after being hand-picked for the job by former police Commissioner Ronny Watson, who is black, said Academy Director Thomas Fleming.

"I have nothing but the highest respect for him as a police officer. He is very professional and he is a good role model for the young recruits in the police academy," Fleming told The Associated Press on Thursday.

The course, called "Racial Profiling," teaches about different cultures that officers could encounter in their community "and how you don't want to single people out because of their ethnic background or the culture they come from," Fleming said.

obama: i don't know anything about it, except the white cop acted stupidly

By now you've heard about the arrest of Henry Gates. But did you hear that Obama, while admitting he didn't know the facts, said the Police acted "stupidly". How the hell does he know? He doesn't even know the facts! Heck, he doesn't even have the story right. Check out all the stories on memorandum.



Wow, another race card. And Obama said, "I think it's fair to say any of us would be pretty angry." Why would ANYONE be angry if someone saw two men trying to bust down a door and called the police? I would be glad neighbors were looking out for my home. WHY why why would that make anyone angry? The police come and you show your ID. End of story.

Sgt. James Crowley was doing his job, responding to a 911 call of a possible B&E and was attacked, called a racist, and now is being told he acted "stupidly" by the President of the United States. By a President who doesn't even have his facts straight. Witnesses support Crowley.

abc_gma_harris_090723_mn
View this video here.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

a true welcome home to a hero

Killed in action the week before, the body of Sergeant First Class John C. Beale was returned to Falcon Field in Peachtree City, Georgia, just south of Atlanta, on June 11, 2009. Sergeant Beale was from Henry County and local police escorted the procession from Atlanta to the funeral home in McDonough, Henry County, Georgia.

A simple notice had been placed in the local papers indicating the route to be taken and the approximate time.

You won’t believe what happened along the way, all the way from Atlanta to McDonough.




Nowadays one can be led to believe that America no longer respects honor and no longer honors sacrifice outside the military. Be it known that there are many places in this land where people still recognize the courage and impact of total self sacrifice. Georgia remains one of those grateful places. The link below is a short, amateur video travelogue of that day's remarkable journey.

But only watch this if you wish to have some of your faith in people restored.
*

*received in email - don't know the author.

john-c-beale-2009-6-6-18-20-15

An Army carry team carries the transfer case containing the remains of U.S. Army Staff Sgt. John C. Beale, 39, of Riverdale, Ga., during a dignified transfer ceremony at Dover Air Force Base, Del., Saturday, June 6, 2009. According to the Department of Defense, Beale was one of three soldiers killed June 4 near Kapisa, Afghanistan, of wounds suffered from an improvised explosive device and small arms fire. Beale was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 108th Reconnaissance, Surveillance and Target Acq

Friday, July 17, 2009

“The world depended on them. They depended on each other.”

My friend Kristi forwarded this to me:

Memorial Service: you're invited.

We're hearing a lot today about big splashy memorial services.

I would like a nationwide memorial service for Darrell "Shifty" Powers.

Shifty volunteered for the airborne in WWII and served with Easy Company of the 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, part of the 101st Airborne Infantry. If you've seen Band of Brothers on HBO or the History Channel, you know Shifty. His character appears in all 10 episodes, and Shifty himself is interviewed in several of them.

I met Shifty in the Philadelphia airport several years ago. I didn't know who he was at the time.


I just saw an elderly gentleman having trouble reading his ticket. I offered to help, assured him that he was at the right gate, and noticed the "Screaming Eagle", the symbol of the 101st Airborne, on his hat.

Making conversation, I asked him if he'd been in the 101st Airborne or if his son was serving.
He said quietly that he had been in the 101st.

I thanked him for his service, then asked him when he served, and how many jumps he made.

Quietly and humbly, he said "Well, I guess I signed up in 1941 or so, and was in until sometime in 1945 . . . " at which point my heart skipped.

At that point, again, very humbly, he said "I made the 5 training jumps at Toccoa, and then jumped into Normandy . . . . do you know where Normandy is?" At this point my heart stopped.

I told him yes, I know exactly where Normandy was, and I know what D-Day was.

At that point he said "I also made a second jump into Holland , into Arnhem ."

I was standing with a genuine war hero . . . . and then I realized that it was June, just after the anniversary of D-Day.

I asked Shifty if he was on his way back from France , and he said "Yes. And it's real sad because these days so few of the guys are left, and those that are, lots of them can't make the trip." My heart was in my throat and I didn't know what to say.

I helped Shifty get onto the plane and then realized he was back in Coach, while I was in First Class. I sent the flight attendant back to get him and said that I wanted to switch seats.
When Shifty came forward, I got up out of the seat and told him I wanted him to have it, that I'd take his in coach.

He said "No, son, you enjoy that seat. Just knowing that there are still some who remember what we did and still care is enough to make an old man very happy." His eyes were filling up as he said it. And mine are brimming up now as I write this.

Shifty died on June 17 after fighting cancer.

There was no parade.

No big event in Staples Center.

No wall to wall back to back 24 x 7 news coverage.

No weeping fans on television.

And that's not right.

Let's give Shifty his own Memorial Service, online, in our own quiet way.

Please forward this email to everyone you know. Especially to the veterans.

Rest in peace, Shifty.

"A nation without heroes is nothing." Roberto Clemente




Staff Sergeant Powers served with E Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States), 101st Airborne Division in World War II. Shifty was an original member of Easy Company, training at Camp Toccoa, Georgia. Shifty’s hometown was Clinchco, Virginia, in Dickenson County.


Thursday, July 9, 2009

adventures in terrace gardening

Two months ago I decided to try and plant some tomatoes on my terrace. I have been craving a garden for years, but lacking a yard, I didn't think I could grow fresh veggies. Well, I decied to give it a go, and boy - did it work!

This is my terrace on May 4. I planted six tomato plants that we picked up at the store - not knowing anything about tomatoes, I didn't realize the plants come in different varieties, some better for terraces. We just bought what they had available. These happen to be the vining kind, not the best for terraces, they do have shorter bushier types for that. But these worked well, anyway, for our terrace.

Here is a picture of the newly plants tomatoes. Also, in the corner you can see my avocado plant, started from a seed from an avocado we ate. We now have three plants - all starters. I don't know if they will actually bare fruit, but I am hoping. And they are pretty plants, anyway.


I also planted one tomato plant upside down, inspired by the Topsy Turvey planter thing. I really should have used a larger planter, but we couldn't figure out a way to attach it anywhere (that yellow wall is not strong enough) and so we just threw it in a planter we had, and said *what the hey*. You can see the little plant coming out the bottom. I planted a little flower in the top, but have now replaced it with a water bottle cut in half, and a tiny hole poked in it, to provide a slow drip of water to the tomato.

Three springs ago I picked up this little strawberry planter, and six plants, and for the last three years we have had luscious strawberries! (although, my neighbor tends to eat most of them because they grow when we are on vacation...) The fruit is bare right now, but the leaves look really good.



I also have two lemon trees - one I purchased, and the same week Zia Giuili got me one for my birthday. This spring they didn't look so hot after the cold winter, but after feeding them a few times, and giving them lots of sun and water, they are taking off. They are loaded with flower buds and teeny tiny lemons.


Here are my plants now. They are about five or six feet tall, and LOADED with tomatoes and flowers. Loaded.

The upside down tomato has one great tomato growing and lots of new flowers. He is a little slower I think because the lack of dirt and water. But, he is doing pretty good, considering.


My avocado trees are growing like weeds. The tall one is about six feet tall, too. And loaded with new growth.



Today we picked the first two tomatoes. They are a little funny shaped, I think because when I was in Seattle they suffered a little for water. The newer ones on the vines are all perfect and round.


Next year I plan to do this again, but will definitely invest in a bigger pot, and maybe plant only two or three tomato plants. I think soon we are going to have them coming out of our ears. They need watered about twice a day now because the weather has been so hot, and their planters are too small. They are thirsty little suckers. I also want to plant a zucchini. I love fresh zucchini!


I also picked up some Sangue di bue at the store when I was searching for some tomato fertilizer. It had a picture of tomatoes in the label, and I knew sangue was blood. I had heard that some kind of blood stuff was good for tomatoes, so I bought two bottles. It is GROSS. It is literally ox's blood. I have used it three times, once a week, and the plants seem to love it. I used it for all of my plants, and seriously, they are all thriving. It is a great food, if you can get over the smell and the bubbles it makes when you add water. EWE!

If you have wanted to plant a garden, but don't have the yard for it, go for a terrace garden! It is just a little investment, a little bit of work, and lots of reward!!

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Saturday, July 4, 2009

all that, just for accepting a nomination to serve her country.... UPDATED













Lord help the next woman who dares to think she can actually serve in the White House.

UPDATE: Excellent diary from Reclusive Leftist: Feminists and the mystery of Sarah Palin

A snipit:

"But even weirder is what happens when you try to replace the myths with the truth. If you explain, “no, she didn’t charge rape victims,” your feminist interlocutor will come back with something else: “she’s abstinence-only!” No, you say, she’s not; and then the person comes back with, “she’s a creationist!” and so on. “She’s an uneducated moron!” Actually, Sarah Palin is not dumb at all, and based on her interviews and comments, I’d say she has a greater knowledge of evolution, global warming, and the Wisconsin glaciation in Alaska than the average citizen.

But after you’ve had a few of these myth-dispelling conversations, you start to realize that it doesn’t matter. These people don’t hate Palin because of the lies; the lies exist to justify the hate. That’s why they keep reaching and reaching for something else, until they finally get to “she winked on TV!”

Friday, July 3, 2009

"'barack obama is a big fat liar', illustrated" times two

I read two great posts from NRO, Barack Obama Is a Big Fat Liar by Jim Geraghty, and 'Barack Obama is a Big Fat Liar,' Illustrated, by Guy Benson.

Geraghty writes:

Ever since Barack Obama declared his candidacy for president, it’s been easy — and great fun — to spotlight when his promises and statements come with “expiration dates.” The list is long: Public financing. Renegotiating NAFTA. His promise to support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies. His inability to disown Rev. Jeremiah Wright. The release of detainee photos. Denouncing Turkey for genocide.

Flip-flops are nothing new in politics, but every once in a while, a president breaks a promise or an important pledge on such an epic level that it defines him, at least in part: “Read my lips: No new taxes.” “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” “We did not — repeat — did not trade weapons or anything else for hostages — nor will we.” Even “I will never lie to you.”

Barack Obama’s sudden about-face on taxing employer-provided health insurance deserves to rank among these classics.
He goes on to talk about how "Obama spent $44 million attacking McCain for an idea that Obama no longer opposes". Read the rest here.

Guy Benson takes the article a step further, and illustrates with video the flip flopping and attacks by Obama, regarding the issue of taxing employer-based benefits.

But now the White House — desperate for revenue — seems to be changing its tune:

In early October [Obama] went even further, calling McCain’s plan “so radical, so out of touch with what you’re facing, and so out of line with our basic values.”

On Capitol Hill, however, Democrats have long liked the idea as a new form of tax revenue. Obama’s relentless denunciation of the proposal would seem to preclude his signing it into law, but “would seem to” is not “does.” Back in March, White House budget director Peter Orszag said taxing employer benefits was among several ideas that “most firmly should remain on the table,” and some congressional Democrats told the Washington Post that White House officials said Obama would accept such a tax “as long as he didn’t have to propose it himself.”

Finally, during Wednesday’s p.r. push for his health-care plan, Obama refused to rule out the proposal that he once said made John McCain unfit for office.

I went back and found a number of the ads Obama ran against McCain on this front. The impending expiration of this particular campaign promise is especially galling when one actually views the ads themselves — bearing in mind that the risky, out-of-touch, unaffordable, deal-breaking healthcare policies these ads ruthlessly targeted are now on the brink of being embraced by their one-time chief critic. Marvel:
Benson posted these must see videos:

One Word;
Can't Explain;
Presription Ad;
"This last one's especially laughable in light of this story" - It Gets Worse;
"Finally, for good measure, here's top Obama strategist David Axelrod explaining on Sunday why "formulations" may force his boss to, well, change his mind." - Obama Won't Rule Out Middle Class Tax Hike.

But the story doesn't stop with taxing employer-provided health insurance and McCain. Obama spent quite a lot of time attacking Hillary on mandates, an idea that he says he could now support.

Acknowledging that his thinking on the issue has "evolved," President Barack Obama says he could support a law mandating that individuals purchase health care coverage, with fines for those who do not, but he stressed that there must be some kind of waiver for those who are simply unable to afford it.

"People have made some pretty compelling arguments to me [Hmm perhaps like Hillary did all during the primary???] that if we want to have a system that drives down costs for everybody, then we've got to have healthier people not opt out of the system," the president said in an exclusive interview with ABC's Diane Sawyer today on "Good Morning America."


During the election campaign, Obama said he was opposed to a federal law mandating the purchase of health care coverage. But earlier this month in a letter to Congressional leaders working on the reform legislation, he said he would consider supporting such a measure, if it has room for exemptions for small businesses and individuals who cannot afford the premiums.

Obama would not say if he was open to taxing health benefits, but indicated that there was a breaking point in the balance sheets where he would say that the cost of reforming the system is too great for the federal government to handle.




Obama even went so far as to attack Hillary's efforts from 1993.



He'll run his own Henry and Louise ads?? He did, remember?

obama-attack-mailer1




Susan covered this last year, Krugman: If Obama Is President, There’s No Chance for Universal Health Care

And many of you probably remember this:

The Wages of HillaryCare

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama agree on most policy issues, but that makes their rare differences all the more revealing. To wit, their running scrap over Mrs. Clinton's "individual mandate" for health care, which Mr. Obama has now had the nerve to expose for its inevitable government coercion.

Mrs. Clinton's proposal requires everyone to buy health insurance, along with more insurance regulation, a government insurance option for everyone and tax hikes. Mr. Obama likes all that but his mandate would only apply to children. He argues that the reason many people aren't insured is because it's too expensive, not because they don't want it. Mrs. Clinton counters that coverage can't be "universal" without a mandate.

But then Mr. Obama had the impudence to defend his views. His campaign distributed a mailer in key primary states that claimed the Clinton plan "forces everyone to buy insurance, even if you can't afford it." It also featured an image of an anxious couple at a kitchen table. The Clinton apparat went apoplectic, claiming the flyer evokes the famous "Harry and Louise" commercials. A common article of liberal faith is that this "smear campaign" doomed HillaryCare in 1994 -- as opposed to, say, its huge cost and complexities. But never mind.
Obama repeatedly attacked Hillary Clinton and John McCain for their healthcare plans, and NOW he is moving towards embracing their proposals. Why? Because what he is trying to do is damned expensive, and THEY knew that. He didn't. The very idea that he is now considering incorporating their plans just goes against everything he campaigned on. The hours and hours of debates discussing healthcare reform.... his constant arguments and attacks. His cockiness and assurance that his plan was the best, and Clinton and McCain were wrong.... It just shows how little he knew, and how willing he is to break a promise.

From Time Magazine:

On Tuesday, Obama himself sounded almost resigned that taxing health benefits is now front and center in the health-care debate. "This is something that's going to be debated in the House and the Senate," he told the Virginia audience. "[Virginia Senator] Mark Warner is going to have to weigh in on it. We're all going to have to weigh in on it." The President says he still wouldn't go as far as McCain proposed and completely eliminate the current exclusion on taxation of employer-provided health benefits. (McCain would have offset that with a tax credit of up to $5,000.) But Obama is indicating a new willingness to go at least part of the way there.

"Nobody at this point is — or not many folks — are talking about taxing benefits or completely eliminating the exclusion," Obama said. But he noted that taxing benefits above a certain point — citing, as an example, $13,000 a year — would have some benefits in holding down costs overall. "If you get some Cadillac plan that costs $17,000, then what we're going to do [under this scenario] is you're going to have to pay taxes on that last $4,000," Obama said. "And the idea that is being debated in Congress right now is, Is that a good way to ensure that people don't have these big Cadillac plans but instead have more sensible plans?"

The major reason lawmakers are considering taxing these benefits for the first time: there's a lot of money involved. Depending on how it is structured, a tax on the most expensive benefits could bring in hundreds of billions of dollars over the next 10 years, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated. But it would be a politically treacherous move that would not affect only the wealthy. Many of those generous health plans are also part of union contracts — and in many cases were negotiated in lieu of higher wages — which means Obama might have to go back on his campaign promise not to raise taxes on those earning less than $250,000 a year.
Today, from the Wall Street Journal:Senate Seeks to Pare Tab for Health Overhaul

A revamped Senate bill aimed at improving the nation's health system would cost $611 billion over a decade, congressional number crunchers estimate, down from $1 trillion two weeks ago.
But the total cost of the health-care overhaul is likely to increase substantially once a key element to expand insurance coverage is added in.

Senate leaders on Thursday unveiled fresh details of legislation aimed at carrying out President Barack Obama's plans to cover the nation's 46 million uninsured. The new provisions call for all but the smallest employers to provide workers with health insurance or to pay the government an annual penalty of up to $750 per employee.
From the Washington Post:

Senate Democrats and President Obama, trying to assuage fears about the cost of health reform, yesterday touted new estimates that put the price tag for one bill at $611 billion over the next decade.

But the measure drafted by the Senate health committee falls far short of Obama's goal of providing insurance to virtually every American. Analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, released in a letter yesterday, shows that it would cover just 39 percent of uninsured Americans in 2019 -- or about 21 million of the 54 million people expected to lack coverage if no change is made.
Shikha Dalmia, for Forbes, wrote Obama's Top Five Health Care Lies, and here are the top two:

President Barack Obama walked into the Oval Office with a veritable halo over his head. In the eyes of his backers, he could say or do no wrong because he had evidently descended directly from heaven to return celestial order to our fallen world. Oprah declared his tongue to be "dipped in the unvarnished truth." Newsweek editor Evan Thomas averred that Obama "stands above the country and above the world as a sort of a God."

But when it comes to health care reform, with every passing day, Obama seems less God and more demagogue, uttering not transcendental truths, but bald-faced lies. Here are the top five lies that His Awesomeness has told--the first two for no reason other than to get elected and the next three to sell socialized medicine to a wary nation.

Lie One: No one will be compelled to buy coverage.

During the campaign, Obama insisted that he would not resort to an individual mandate to achieve universal coverage. In fact, he repeatedly ripped Hillary Clinton's plan for proposing one. "To force people to buy coverage," he insisted, "you've got to have a very harsh penalty." What will this penalty be, he demanded? "Are you going to garnish their wages?" he asked Hillary in one debate.

Yet now, Obama is behaving as if he said never a hostile word about the mandate. Earlier this month, in a letter to Sens. Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., he blithely declared that he was all for "making every American responsible for having health insurance coverage, and making employers share in the cost."

But just like Hillary, he is refusing to say precisely what he will do to those who want to forgo insurance. There is a name for such a health care approach: It is called TonySopranoCare.

Lie Two: No new taxes on employer benefits.

Obama took his Republican rival, Sen. John McCain, to the mat for suggesting that it might be better to remove the existing health care tax break that individuals get on their employer-sponsored coverage, but return the vast bulk--if not all--of the resulting revenues in the form of health care tax credits. This would theoretically have made coverage both more affordable and portable for everyone. Obama, however, would have none of it, portraying this idea simply as the removal of a tax break. "For the first time in history, he wants to tax your health benefits," he thundered. "Apparently, Sen. McCain doesn't think it's enough that your health premiums have doubled. He thinks you should have to pay taxes on them too."

Yet now Obama is signaling his willingness to go along with a far worse scheme to tax employer-sponsored benefits to fund the $1.6 trillion or so it will cost to provide universal coverage. Contrary to Obama's allegations, McCain's plan did not ultimately entail a net tax increase because he intended to return to individuals whatever money was raised by scrapping the tax deduction. Not so with Obama. He apparently told Sen. Baucus that he would consider the senator's plan for rolling back the tax exclusion that expensive, Cadillac-style employer-sponsored plans enjoy, in order to pay for universal coverage. But, unlike McCain, he has said nothing about putting offsetting deductions or credits in the hands of individuals.

In other words, Obama might well end up doing what McCain never set out to do: Impose a net tax increase on health benefits for the first time in history.


CNN Obama interview on Mandates


How does that make economic sense? It apparently didn't...

But don't worry. Remember, Obama said, "If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what."

Oh, wait.

At a White House press conference on Tuesday, Obama seemed to back off from his promise that people who like their health care plans will be able to keep them under his plan for reform.

Instead of saying that "no one" will take away any American's health insurance, Obama said only that the government would not do so, but pinned the possible changes on employers, who may adjust their health care plans due to costs.

"I can guarantee you that there's the possibility for a whole lot of Americans out there that they're not going to end up having the same health care they have," he said Tuesday. "Because what's going to happen is, as costs keep on going up, employers are going to start making decisions: 'We've got to raise premiums on our employees. In some cases, we can't provide health insurance at all.'"

This was a shift from what the president said just last week, when he told a gathering of the nation's doctors, "If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what."
Well...ok, so don't worry about that. Obama thinks his plan is so awesome that he most heartedly endorses this plan, and promises that he would use this for his own family members.



Oh, never mind. Well, it's good enough for you, anyway.

***

Further reading on taxing health benefits:

From the NY Times: Administration Is Open to Taxing Health Benefits

From the California Health Line: Administration Officials Say Obama Is Open to Taxes on Some Benefits

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

palin derangement syndrome continues

Todd Purdum from Vanity Fair just wrote an article about Sarah Palin, and I can't decide if he wants to take her down, or get down with her.

"Sarah Palin is still the sexiest brand in Republican politics....she is by far the best-looking woman ever...the first indisputably fertile female to dare to dance with the big dogs....she looks like a beauty queen....When she chooses to reveal herself....Palin is at once the sexiest and the riskiest brand in the Republican Party...Palin turns her debate with Joe Biden into a winkathon...nailing...knockout...she was a fresh-faced reformer..."

"It Came from Wasilla" is an idiotic hit piece, filled with anonymous sources, and a revival of Trig trutherisms. "Complete with a slew of juicy, negative quotes from insiders and a smoothly crafted narrative that demeans and diminishes Palin's accomplishments."

Real Clear Politics says it best:

Todd Purdum pulls down the black ski mask and whips out the sawed off shotgun for this utterly predictable hit piece on Sarah Palin in the August issue of Vanity Fair.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails